Your voice and lived experience is critical to getting the future of San O right. Thank you in advance for taking the time to complete the following engagement exercises.
The following exercises are a direct copy of what people completed at the in-person assembly. All comments will be transcribed; your identity will not be shared publicly.
If you have not yet watched the San O Community Assembly webinar, please do so before responding. You can view the recording here. Many of the questions asked in this survey build on what was presented in the webinar.
Your first name is required. Email is suggested in case we have further questions or need clarification. Your information will not be publicly shared.
Below are the top recurring words from community responses between 2024–2026, drawn from over 150 responses.
From over 150 responses, the main themes and values that emerged are below. What values resonate most with you? You may place two stickers. You can place both on one card or split them; distribute them in a way that most reflects what's most important to you. Place your stickers by clicking each card. Click again to add more or remove.
Project goal: Increase the resilience of Surf Beach using nature-based solutions to maintain access in the near to mid term (10–30 years) and support long-term adaptation. Below are four potential concepts being evaluated.
What: Mounds of sand that form low topography (1–3 ft) along the shoreline.
Where: Along the back of sufficiently wide sandy beaches where wind can blow sand inland.
Why/How: Provide important coastal habitat and serve as a buffer against storms. Can provide sand and space for the beach to migrate during erosion events.
Dunes fit best where a wide, undisturbed beach allows them to form and recover. Current conditions and use make it challenging to establish dunes at San O today.
What: Deposits of rounded rock, typically 2–10 inches, often buried by beach sand and exposed seasonally.
Where: Develop near river mouths and along erosive bluffs.
Why/How: Naturally adjust to storms and sea level rise, providing erosion resistance that is more flexible and accessible.
Cobble berms are dynamic shoreline features that can provide erosion resistance that is compatible with natural coastal processes. A cobble berm appears practical and site-compatible for San O and could help reduce erosion along the constrained and actively used shoreline.
What: A nearshore deposit of cobble and/or boulders that can be buried by beach sand and exposed seasonally.
Where: Develop naturally at river mouths and where retreating bluffs supply coarse sediment.
Why/How: Artificial reefs could dampen waves and support surfing resources.
Cobble reef nourishment at San O is risky: higher cost, uncertain effectiveness and resilience, greater impacts, likely still need cobble berm component to increase parking lot resilience.
What: Flowing and eroding watersheds deliver sand to the coast; eroding bluffs provide additional sediment.
Where: Erosion occurs anywhere you let it.
Why/How: Allowing erosion at a bluff- or dune-backed shoreline creates more space for a beach to persist with sea level rise. At San O, eroded bluff sediment also provides coarse material that forms the reef and its surf breaks.
At San O, allowing more natural erosion could help reconnect bluff, beach, and reef processes over time.
The following questions are separate from the San Onofre Shoreline Resilience Project. They focus on CA State Parks concepts for immediate access needs — in case the road is damaged before the long-term design is implemented.
You told us: parking loss is your top concern.
Based on shoreline erosion observed last winter and forecasts for a strong El Niño this coming winter, there is significant risk that the beachfront road and parking lot could become unsafe or inaccessible to vehicles. A nearby alternative will likely be needed.
Immediate alternative access options are limited to land within the State Parks' lease area. The concept: repurpose the current queuing lot as an alternative parking area, with queuing relocated to a different location pending traffic studies.
*Please keep comments only relating to parking. The next questions will focus on getting to the beach from the bluff and access for people with mobility disabilities.
If a parking alternative is offered on the bluff, users will need a way to get down to the beach. California State Parks is pursuing funding to study whether a bluff-top staircase is engineerable.
The next series of questions are specifically for mobility-disabled and adaptive beach users. Bluff trails and staircases would not provide access for this group — so we're asking separately.
You told us: disabled access is the #2 issue.
San O has an incredibly robust community of adaptive users and users with mobility disabilities. We understand that stairs or trails to the bluff would not provide access for this user group.
Last year, we asked disabled users about the possibility of using a shuttle system to travel from the bluff to the beach. The proposed options were: (1) shuttle at set times, (2) shuttle by pre-scheduling, and (3) I would not use a shuttle. Two votes were cast for pre-scheduling, and two comments expressed concern about on-demand availability.
* In both alternatives, users would still be responsible for launching their own watercraft.
*The dotted red line on the map indicates where parking would likely be cut off and unnavigable for vehicles in the event of a major road failure.
This is your open space. If something didn't fit into the previous exercises — or if you want to add more context to any of your answers — leave it here.
Your input goes directly to the Surfrider Foundation team and California State Parks as part of the community engagement record. It won't be shared publicly.
Questions? Reach out to Surfrider →